3.10 The public broadcaster offers varied programmes representing all interests. Analysis: ORTM tries to offer varied programmes with derisory means, not allowing to satisfy the demand and needs of listeners and viewers. Panellists regret the lack of political debate which can be explained by the lack of well prepared resources. Other topics of interest are not treated or very little. Meanwhile, the matter has cooled down regarding the return to channelled debate. Individual marks: Average: 4-3-3-3-4-5-4-4-3-5 3.8 3.11 The public broadcaster supplies balanced and fair information, reflecting different points of view and opinion. Analysis: ORTM is mainly criticized to privilege the circulation of information on presidential tenure to the detriment of other political actors judging that there is no balance. Certain civil society organizations are of the same opinion. A request was made to the office to make an effort and take into consideration civil society. Individual marks: Average: 2-3-3-2-3-3-1-2-2-2 2.3 3.12 The public broadcaster presents a local content being as varied and creative as economically tangible. Analysis: According to the specifications, ORTM must produce more local content with at least 60% for television. A particular accent is put on the promotion of national languages. This develops a dynamic production policy and broadcasting of attractive and educational programmes on the radio and television on three-fold level - national, regional and local. Today, it proposes a more and more home-based content. Individual marks: Average: 5-4-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5 4.9 Total average of Sector 3 2.7 43