The constitution has established a semiauthoritarian regime in which the president
holds significant decision-making power.

reject a judge.
He appoints heads of oversight institutions
who do not have security of tenure as these
heads can be removed without explanation.

Moreover, the judiciary is increasingly
politicised, and oversight institutions and
security organs are firmly under the president’s
control.

Media freedom

Despite this facade of openness, media
freedom faces significant challenges, mirroring
the broader political climate.

Despite being regarded as one of Africa’s most
stable democracies, Botswana has been ruled
by a single party since 1966.

The use of threats comes in both subtle and
direct forms — such as the withholding of
advertising, which has proven to be a coercive
tactic in bringing “errant” media outlets into
compliance.

As a result there is little incentive for the ruling
party to respond to the needs and concerns of
the populace.
Media freedom continues to face challenges,
as highlighted by Freedom House. The level of
freedom of expression and civil society often
reflects the stance of the current administration.

Consequently, many resort to self-censorship
to sustain their viability and operations. This has
led to a decimation in quality, alongside a decline
in trust in the media, as well as a surge in fake
news and a reduction in audience engagement.

While there appears to be some improvement
compared to Ian Khama’s administration,
his successor, President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s
initiatives often lack substantive action on the
ground, serving more as window dressing.

The political and media
landscape

Likewise President Masisi has paid lip service to
safeguarding the security of journalists, so they
still face intimidation and harassment from the
country’s domestic and international intelligence
agency, the Directorate of Intelligence and
Security (DIS).

At first glance, Botswana stands as an oasis of
political stability and economic prosperity within
the African continent, garnering praise from
the 2022 Ibrahim Index of African Governance
report for its “democratic traditions.”

President Masisi, had promised that under his
leadership, the DIS would embrace transparency
while Peter Magosi, the director general of the
DIS and successor to the founding director, had
guaranteed that the intelligence organisation
would shift away from its tendency to detain
journalists.

However, beneath this veneer of success lies
the nuanced reality, characterised by a large
percentage of the citizenry still living below
the poverty datum line with little prospect for
accumulating wealth.
This is exacerbated by lack of citizen
participation in the political and economic
spheres.

Two years later, DIS agents raided Mmegi, a
local newspaper’s offices, arrested its editor and
a reporter while thy were working on a story
and seized their electronic equipment, including
mobile phones.

“Barriers to political participation include the
first past the post electoral system, political
party funding structures and a fragmented
opposition, all of which have helped to entrench
the ruling party’s hegemony.”

According to the outlet, one of the officers
said: “I am a warrant (of arrest) myself”, when
asked for a warrant during the raid.

What is often overlooked is the automatic
succession system in which the vice president
takes over from the president after the end of
a mandatory two terms in office and this has
the detrimental effect of fostering paternalistic
politics.

The arrests of journalists on vague charges
not only violates the principle of freedom of
expression, but also risks worsening an already
adversarial relationship between the government
and the media.

The constitution gives the president sweeping
powers and the incumbent may ignore advice
from the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and
STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 2023

Botswana’s
corruption
watchdog,
the
Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime
(DCEC), sometimes also arrests journalists

26

Select target paragraph3