SECTOR 1 Scores: Individual scores: 1 Country does not meet indicator 2 Country meets only a few aspects of indicator 3 Country meets some aspects of indicator 4 Country meets most aspects of indicator 5 Country meets all aspects of the indicator Average score: 2.4 (2005 = n/a; 2007 = n/a; 2009 = n/a; 2011 = n/a) 1.4 The Government makes every effort to honour regional and international instruments on freedom of expression and freedom of the media. The simple fact that the Government has still not proactively ensured the revision of the legal system which is harmful to freedom of expression, or be doing it within a time which is more than unreasonable – the Government has been considering the revision of the Press Law and the drawing up of the Broadcasting Law since the first mandate of Armando Guebuza (2005-2009)! – having the initiative of law and influence on Parliament, as this is dominated by the party in power, denotes that the necessasry effort is not being made. In truth, almost all international instruments on freedom of expression and freedom of the press have shown progressive measures while Mozambique is still in a situation which is not well adjusted. On the other hand, two members of the Government, namely the PR (paragraph a) of number 2 of Article 245 of the CRM] and the Prime Minister [paragraph d) of number 2 of Article 245 of the CRM] may, at any time, request the Constitutional Council to declare the unconstitutionality of laws which are in breach of the supreme law of the country, but there is no record of this having been done at any time. However, we can note that, in 2012, the National Commission of Human Rights was set up, although it was created by a law in 2009. This fact represents an effort towards the materializaiton of international instruments of Human Rights, including the question of Individual Freedom Rating and Fredom of Expression and of the Press. 72 AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER MOZAMBIQUE 2014