2.8 Media diversity is promoted through adequate competition regulation/legislation. ANALYSIS: Some limitations set by the communications act and the competition laws have not really been put to the test. However, the legislation is not specific as is the case in South Africa where the act limits the number of radio or TV stations one individual or company is allowed to own. There have been a lot of developments in competition law up to a certain stage and then it was just abandoned. The reason: the strength of some of the present monopolies. SWAPO-owned Kalahari Holdings, for example, is a majority share-holder of Multichoice and Radio Energy. Monopolies are not yet a problem in Namibia but could become one in the future. SCORES: Individual scores: Average score: 2.9 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 2, 2 2.3 Government promotes a political and economic environment which allows for a diverse media landscape. ANALYSIS: Government does not actively promote a conducive environment for a diverse media but does not put any impediments in the way either. If an individual or a company has the money to start a radio station or a newspaper, there is no government interference. The fact that all but one commercial radio stations in Namibia are run by middle-aged white men leads to the question why those who were previously disadvantaged should not enjoy special promotion by introducing a system of black economic empowerment. SCORES: Individual scores: Average score: 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2 1.8 2.10 Private media outlets operate as efficient and professional businesses. ANALYSIS: The fact that the existing private media outlets have all been on the market for a considerable period of time indicates that they operate as efficient and professional businesses. SCORES: Individual scores: Average score: 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4 4.3 2.11 State print media are not subsidised with taxpayers money. ANALYSIS: So This Is Democracy? 2005 -232- Media Institute of Southern Africa