ANALYSIS:
In all public/state media institutions the election of members of the boards follows
nominations from within the ruling party. There is no transparency in this process, with
the consequence that the appointees are not very concerned with the actual service that
they are expected to deliver to the public. First and foremost, there is an overwhelming
preoccupation with pleasing those who nominate them. As an example, the previous
director of the National Radio of Angola, who is now Minister of Communications,
occupied the post while at the same time being part of the Central Committee of the
ruling party. The same goes for the director of the state newspaper and the news
agency.
SCORES:
Individual scores:

1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

Average score:

1.1

3.6

Persons who have vested interests of a political or commercial nature are
excluded from possible membership in the board, i.e. office bearers with the state
and political parties as well as those with a financial interest in the broadcasting
industry.

ANALYSIS:
The main criterion for the selection of persons to serve on administrative bodies of state
media is their closeness to the ruling party and their ability to guarantee the defence of
the interests of those in power.
SCORES:
Individual scores:

1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

Average score:

1.1

3.7.

The editorial independence of the public broadcaster from commercial
pressure and political influence is guaranteed by law and practice.

ANALYSIS:
Although the Act on Broadcasting Activities is clear in demanding independence in
matters of programming [article 8 (2)], this provision is not respected even at the most
15

Select target paragraph3