SECTOR 3 Scores: Individual scores: 1 Country does not meet indicator 2 Country meets only a few aspects of indicator 3 Country meets some aspects of indicator 4 Country meets most aspects of indicator 5 Country meets all aspects of the indicator Average score: 2.8 (2005: 1.1; 2007: 1.3; 2009:1.0; 2011: 1.4) 3.2 Broadcasting is regulated by an independent body that is adequately protected by law against interference and whose board is not dominated by any particular political party and is appointed – in an open way - involving civil society and not dominated by any particular political party. Currently, as mentioned in indicator 3.1, there is no active regulatory body for the broadcasting sector, which remains in limbo. Legislation governing the Swaziland Communications Commission stipulates that its board of directors be appointed by the ICT minister. A board of directors was recently formed, but staff for the body are yet to be appointed,. The ICT minister appoints the chairman, and may fire this person as well as any board member without giving any reasons. This manner of appointment impacts on the independence of the board. The board comprises nine commissioners, most of whom are government representatives. These include the CEO, a representative from each of the four line ministries (ICT, education, finance and commerce), two royal appointments (a prince and a chief, who represent the interests of the king), and two ‘independent’ members. According to the 2013 Swaziland Media Communications Act, political party members are not eligible for board membership. The process for the appointment of the current board was closed, and in no way transparent or inclusive. “How the minister identified some of these individuals is not publicly known. Practically everything in Swaziland is pre-determined and the current commission is clearly dominated by interests of the monarchy and the state.” 48 AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER Swaziland 2014