STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 2022

Freedom of expression and media freedom
are provided for in Angola’s constitution. In
addition, online rights are protected through
the 2011 Law on Electronic Communications
and Information Company Services.
In January 2017, the then President Eduardo
dos Santos passed the Press Law and also
assented to the Pacote legislativo da comunicação
social — the Television Law, Broadcast Law,
Journalists Code of Conduct, and statutes for the
establishment of the Angolan Regulatory Body
for Social Communication — a body responsible
for regulating social media content.
The shortcomings of the Press Law is that it
defines certain conduct as “criminal” in unclear
and sweeping terms and establishes excessive
penalties for those crimes, including defamation.
It also includes provisions that may result in
excessive limitations on press freedom; and
it provides for the establishment of licensing
procedures for private TV and radio broadcasters
that are largely subject to the discretion of
governmental bodies.

LEGAL AND REGULATORY
FRAMEWORKS
While
Angola’s
constitution
and
legal
framework provide for media freedom and
freedom of expression, the array of legislation

regulating the media impedes these rights.
Hanging as a threat over the media sector is
a bundle of five laws passed by parliament in
2016 referred to as the Social Communication
Legislative package — which directly impact on
the media.(4)
Former President dos Santos also passed the
Press Law, which inhibits the work of the media,
criminalises defamation and most importantly
limits freedom of expression.
Recommendations that have been brought
forward during Angola’s UPR process are that
it must:
Repeal criminal defamation laws
Amend Act No. 1 of 2017 to remove
mandatory registration of journalists
Repeal the offence of sedition
Remove criminal liability for the spread of
false news
Angola was applauded for being one of the first
African countries to pass access to information
legislation in the form Law 11/02 of 16 August
2002 on access to documents held by public
authorities.
The major drawback is that the government has
not done enough to implement the legislation.
If anything, government bodies are seemingly
protected from disclosing information, especially
around state security.
Recommendations made to the government

Ludmila Pinto (right) said
she was a�acked as a
warning to her husband
Angolan journalist
Claudio Pinto (le�)
PIC CREDIT: Claudio Pinto
via CPJ

30

Select target paragraph3