Zimbabwe
the other papers followed suit. Self-censorship in the independent
media is also motivated by fear of offending advertisers.
SCORES:
Individual scores:

1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 3

Average score:

1.7

4.7.

Owners of private media do not interfere with editorial
independence.

ANALYSIS:
There needs to be a distinction between positive/reasonable interference and negative/unreasonable interference by the owners.
Problems occur when an editor-in-chief is also the publisher/owner
of a media outlet. In these cases, there will always be active intervention as he/she will be part of the editorial team. In the interest
of independent publishing, the blurring of the separation of powers
between owners and editors is of great concern. Owners sometimes
call to say they want to see certain stories in the paper or the chief
executive will walk into the news room, look at the lead story and
make comments on which direction the story should take. Cases
where the owner phones journalists to alert them to events that
might interest them without complaining should the suggestion not
be taken up are not seen as unreasonable interference.
SCORES:
Individual scores:

3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 3

Average score:

2.2

African Media Barometer - Zimbabwe 2006

35

Select target paragraph3