SECTOR 1 1.10 The state does not seek to block or filter internet content unless laws provide for restrictions that serve a legitimate interest and are necessary in a democratic society. Analysis ...“the government seems to be itching” to act and gain control [over the internet] There is no law or interference. However, concern has been expressed over issues such as pornography and sensational coverage of events. It is noted that the internet is relatively new and a nascent sector where “the government seems to be itching” to act and gain some control, in the same way it has controlled the traditional media. Scores: Individual scores: 1 Country does not meet indicator 2 Country minimally meets aspects of the indicator. 3 Country meets many aspects of indicator but progress may be too recent to judge. 4 Country meets most aspects of indicator. 5 Country meets all aspects of the indicator and has been doing so over time. Average score: 4.7 (2005=n/a; 2007=n/a) 1.11 Civil society in general and media lobby groups actively advance the cause of media freedom. Analysis Civil society and lobby groups are active in advancing media causes but there is no reciprocity on the part of the media. This is partly because of media selfcensorship, cautiousness in the interests of media owners, and other limitations. Engagement between civil society, media lobby groups and the media is sporadic and issue-based. The intensity of engagement varies with issues to be advanced. Early in 2009 civil society joined journalists in street protests over the Kenya 20 AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER KENYA 2009