Malaba ruled that: “The fact that a person has
told lies to others on any subject matter should
not be of concern to the State.”

had been throttled ahead of the launch of the
opposition Citizens Coalition for Change party.

The Constitutional Court further ordered the
striking down of provisions that criminalised the
publication of falsehoods. With that context, it is
surprising that the government still criminalises
the publication of falsehoods and such cases are
entertained by the courts.

Furthermore, the then Information, Publicity
and Broadcasting Services minister Monica
Mutsvangwa, told an Internet Governance
Forum meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, that
shutting down the internet during conflicts was
“justified to prevent digital platforms and social
media from spreading propaganda and fake
news, which might result in bloodshed”. (15)

(14)

It is also important to note that the High
Court ruled in 2021 that the Section 31(a)(iii)
of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform)
Act that had been used to charge journalist
Hopewell Chin’ono for allegedly publishing false
information was non-existent. (9)

This raised the spectre that the Zimbabwean
government could resort to an internet shutdown
ahead of elections.

Media pluralism

This raises the question on why the State went
ahead with charging and convicting politicians
in 2023 on a law that had been said to be nonexistent about two years before.

The age-old problem of State media bias was
again evident in 2023 and the past election.
Despite legal and constitutional provisions
detailing how the State-owned Zimbabwe
Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) should
operate, particularly during elections, it remains
defiant. (16)

Zimbabwe has a history of throttling or
blocking the internet.
Ahead of the 2023 elections, the internet in
Zimbabwe was degraded. There are different
reasons that were given for the degradation of
the internet.

The broadcaster retained it’s position of bias,
with the European Union Electoral Observer
Mission (EU-EOM) noting that ZBC-TV devoted
more than two-thirds of its news and current
affairs coverage to President Mnangagwa, and
the current government.

Internet watchdog NetBlocks reported that
internet service had been throttled in Zimbabwe
on the eve of the country’s general elections.
The degradation had affected customers of
leading internet service providers including
NetOne, Econet, TelOne and Liquid. (10)

On the other hand, ZBC-owned radio stations
gave the ruling party almost all their electionrelated airtime. (17)

However, a different school of thought said
that some undersea cables had been damaged
on August 8, 2023 and this could have been the
reason for the degradation of the internet. (11)

The Southern African Development Community
(SADC) Election Observer Mission (SADC-EOM)
noted that State media was unfair against the
opposition, in that it “the content of the public
broadcaster and the state-owned newspapers
were in favour of one political party, contrary
to the relevant provisions of the [Zimbabwean]
constitution, the Electoral Act, and the Revised
SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing
Democratic Elections, which requires Stateowned media to be impartial.” (18)

In 2016, the government cut off access to
social media sites following demonstrations
organised by #ThisFlag — a protest movement.

(12)

In 2019, the country was engulfed by
demonstrations following an increase in fuel
prices. (13)

The report went on to point out that it had
noted some improvements compared to the
2018 electoral processes.

This led to a weeklong internet shutdown
that was ended by the High Court following
an application by the Zimbabwe Lawyers for
Human Rights and MISA.

The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) is
mandated by law to set up a committee that
monitors the operations of the media during
elections.

The Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and
MISA sought to have the internet shutdown
declared unlawful.

ZEC is also mandated to produce a report on
the conduct of the media during elections. This

In 2022, there were reports that the internet

97

STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 2023

Select target paragraph3