Climate change and environmental issues
remain underreported in Lesotho, largely
because “it does not sell”.

They believe that community-based offices
ought to provide information and responses
without necessitating contact with central
offices.

Political issues are still generally regarded as
newsworthy and more sellable than over any
other content. .

Access to information

In 2022, the Afrobarometer survey on public
opinion revealed that a mere 36% of Lesotho’s
citizens were aware of climate change.

Proposed legislation such as the Access and
Receipt of Information Bill of 2000 has stalled
for over two decades due to a lack of political
will, therefore legislated access to information
remains an illusion, especially for private media.

This ignorance regarding climate change
and environmental concerns may stem from
inadequate coverage by the media.

For public media, there is better access to
information as they are government owned.
Despite this the information is often censored
and filtered to suit the government agenda.

Journalists report difficulties in proposing
climate change stories within their newsrooms,
owing to widespread lack of understanding of
the subject.

Public broadcasters refrain from reporting
content that could cast the government in
an unfavourable light, nor do they foster
governmental accountability.

Nonetheless, initiatives to educate journalists
about climate change and environmental issues
are underway.
Liapeng Raliengoane, one of a few reporters
specialising in climate change and environmental
protection in Lesotho, observed that such
reporting does not receive the necessary
emphasis in the country.

The responsibility to uncover corruption,
hold those in power accountable, and promote
transparency falls predominantly on private
media.
Despite their efforts, these entities encounter
considerable bureaucratic obstacles and face
threats and intimidation when posing challenging
questions or delving into sensitive issues.

It is alarming that only a handful of reporters
possess a comprehensive understanding of, and
regularly cover, this critical issue.
“Media coverage primarily revolves around
politics, overshadowing reporting on climate
change and environmental issues.

On 15 November 2023, Mokoena Ramakatsa,
the chairperson of the Parliamentary Portfolio
Committee on Law kicked out journalists from
a scheduled open committee meeting on the
basis that he was not “comfortable” with their
presence in the meeting.

The limited attention given to these crucial
matters underscores the necessity for heightened
awareness among editors and journalists.”

The National Assembly’s public relations
officer Neo Mokatsa tried to intervene, but the
chairperson maintained his stance. The matter
was reported to the committees clerk.

While the government prioritises food security,
reporters should actively inquire about the
reliability of weather forecasting.
The
discrepancy
between
last
year’s
meteorological predictions, indicating March
rains, and the ongoing rainfall demands
inquisitive and critical questions from the media.

Journalists in Lesotho await the passage of the
media law — one of the pieces of legislation that
the sector hopes, will enable the enjoyment of
freedom of expression in Lesotho, in alignment
with tenets of a democratic state.

There remains a need to emphasise the
importance of climate and environmental
reporting in Lesotho as essential to foster a
more balanced and informed media landscape.

How the media
communicates climate
change and environmental
issues

A need for more reporters to be capacitated
has been raised and for media houses to
have weekly columns and radio programmess
dedicated to climate change and environmental
protection.

43

STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 2023

Select target paragraph3