State of the media in Southern Africa - 2003
The judgment has largely ignored the persuasive wisdom of international tribunals such as the
European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia which have held the “last resort principle” to be an important pillar of media freedom.
This principle may only be violated in the strictest of circumstances. The judgment also takes
no notice of the argument by these two international bodies that by compelling journalists to
testify before all other avenues of information have been exhausted, the work of journalists
will become much more difficult and as a consequence, the right of the public to be informed
about matters of public interest will be impermissibly truncated.
The four organisations are meanwhile considering further avenues of legal recourse including
joining in Munusamy’s case as amici curiae when her counsel appeals to the Constitutional
Court.
Enquiries

Jude Mathurine
Media Institute of Southern Africa - South Africa Chapter
083 7991701
Simon Kimani Ndung’u
FXI
083 7332675
Henry Jeffreys/ Guy Berger- 082 801 1405
South African National Editors Forum
083 286 8347
Tuwani Gumani
Media Workers Association of South Africa
082 679 9057

Press Statement
December 4, 2003
TOPIC: Conduct of former City Press editor
PRESS STATEMENT: “Disgraced” editor an embarrassment to journalism

T

he Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA)-South Africa is deeply shocked by the ap
pearance before the Hefer Commission of former City Press editor Vusi Mona and by his
testimony last week. Mona has disgraced journalism by breaking several cardinal rules of
ethical and professional conduct.
Mona attended a confidential briefing by National Director of Public Prosecutions Bulelani Ngcuka
in July, at the end of which he expressed his satisfaction with the briefing and requested that more
meetings of that nature should be held. A few days later, in an article that made no reference to the
off-the-record briefing, Mona praised the work of Ngcuka’s office. But, several weeks later,
apparently after hearing that Ngcuka’s elite police unit, the Scorpions, were investigating him,
Mona compiled a dossier of complaints about Ngcuka’s conduct at the briefing that he claimed to
be illegal and unconstitutional. He sent his grievances to the Chief Justice, the SA Human Rights
Commission, the Public Protector and the Minister of Justice and then reiterated the contents of
this dossier in testimony before the Hefer Commission.
He claimed he was appearing as “a citizen” and that he was carrying out his duty as a citizen.
Mona’s acceptance of an invitation to testify before the Hefer Commission compromised his
professional obligation to keep the content and source of the briefing a secret. Journalism’s codes

So This Is Democracy? 2003

140

Media Institute of Southern Africa

Select target paragraph3