INTRODUCTION

T

he rapid growth of information communication technologies (ICTs) in Africa has led to a
massive digitalisation of information, which
has, in turn, opened up various social and
economic opportunities. The democratising nature
of information – especially Internet-powered information – has resulted in most governments feeling
uncomfortable (some would say insecure) about
their own positions.
In light of 9/11 (the New York terror attack) and the
so-called Arab Spring, which saw the dismantling of
dictatorships in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya, governments south of the Sahara have been paying particular attention to how communication platforms in
their countries are being used by citizens. This has
led to systematic introduction or amendment of laws
that enable mass surveillance and – with little or no
judicial oversight – the interception and monitoring
of communications.
Content filtering, while not a very common tactic by
governments, is an ever-present option. Pending
legislation in Malawi, for example, alludes to content filtering and puts this burden on Internet Service
Providers (ISPs), whose failure to comply may result
in revocation of operating licences and/or other legal
action.
The implications of these actions on freedom of expression and media freedom are enormous.
Advances in computer and mobile technology, the
expansion of the Internet and the development of
social networks and digital tools have removed
many geographic, social and political barriers to
the exchange of news and information. At the same
time, these developments have created new areas
of vulnerability for media professionals and bloggers
who often are not fully aware of how these new technologies can threaten their privacy and security.
This is particularly true in countries where citizens
face major security challenges such as government
surveillance and intimidation especially of the political kind. Hence, as the Internet gets entrenched as
a human right, how can human rights defenders in
southern Africa be empowered to harness its power
in order to promote democracy and good governance? Also, against the backdrop of increasing restrictions on freedom of expression and increasing
State paranoia in relation to new communication

4

technologies, how can the privacy of human rights
defenders be safeguarded and their surveillance be
circumvented?
These are the questions that prompted MISA to
devise the Freedom of Expression in Cyberspace
project to address the relationship between human
rights and privacy laws and regulations, while raising
awareness on issues of data protection. The project
is designed to challenge existing and future communications surveillance programmes targeted at citizen and mainstream journalists in southern Africa.
Over the past 20 years, MISA has positioned itself as
the primary advocate for media freedom and freedom
of expression in southern Africa. With programmes
that have a global outreach, especially through the
media violations monitoring programme, the organisation’s agenda has been taken up by many civic
organisations in the region, creating consciousness
of the linkages between media freedom, freedom of
expression and broader human rights and democratic campaigns.

Select target paragraph3