SECTOR 1

1.9 The state does not seek to block or filter Internet
content unless in accordance with laws that provide
for restrictions that serve a legitimate interest and are
necessary in a democratic society, and which are applied by independent courts.
There have been incidents where the state has sought to block internet content
that was critical of the government and ruling party in general. No such cases
have gone before the courts, however, and there is currently no requirement that
a court warrant first needs to be obtained before a site is blocked.
“In other incidents where bloggers have been told by state officials to remove
specific content, and they have been bold enough to refuse, these websites have
subsequently been denied government advertising.”
The JamiiForums website (previously known as JamboForums), which has become
a very popular online forum for social debate in Tanzania, has also been a target
of state ire. The site’s founders, Maxence Melo and Mike KcKee, have been
intimidated and threatened numerous times by state actors who have claimed
that user-generated content on the site was defamatory. Because the website’s
servers are in the United States, the Tanzanian government could not actually
shut down JamiiForums. Jamiiforums was targeted during a parliamentary session
early 2015 when MPs warned the founders that the new Cybercrimes Law would
“get them”.
While panellists felt there was generally no obvious blocking of content by the
state, and no judicial procedures or systems in place yet to permit this, “such
blocking may take place without people even being aware of it”.
It was noted that the TCRA apparently has a new monitoring device. In the past
it used a device to filter key words in e-mails, SMSes and on websites, including
social media such as Facebook and Twitter. “They cannot monitor WhatsApp and
BBM though.”

AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER Tanzania 2015

23

Select target paragraph3