[75] Then, there is the fact that the proposition also loses sight of the case of Sikelela Dlamini v The Editor of the Nation and Another (Supra), where the High Court awarded the sum of E120,000.00 to the Plaintiff as damages. [76] In that case, the Defendants had written some articles about the Plaintiff an employee of the Government of Swaziland, employed as such as the Under Secretary in the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. In paragraph 10 of his statement of claim, the Plaintiff alleged that the publications were defamatory in that they were intended to mean and were understood to mean that he is very corrupt, immoral, of reprehensive demeanor, not worthy of public confidence, and wrongfully, unlawfully, furtively and clandestinely abused his position to make personal economic gain. And this, by attempting to influence the outcome of Tender No. 2 and thereafter, it was alleged that the Plaintiff influenced non approval of the said tender, by the Drug Advisory Committee and the Tender Board. Alternatively, the Plaintiff knowingly and dishonestly attempted to award the said tender to a particular bidder by attempting to sit in the Drug Advisory Committee and take charge of the Committee’s task in the adjudication of tenders. [77] Here again, the defamation was less pungent, in that the status of Mr. Dlamini as Under Secretary in a Government ministry, is of less protuberance than that of the Respondent. The publication though impinging on his dignity, however, dealt with his conduct and performance under his portfolio as the said Under Secretary, as opposed to the case instant, where the defamatory words were a vicious attack on the Respondent’s personal life and origins. Then, there is the fact that the award was made 6 years ago in 2008. This of course takes into account the rate of 46