[42] Having stated as above, and without the danger of sounding repetitive, it is imperative that I stress the unreasonableness of the publication in support of the findings of the court a quo. [43] I agree entirely that this is a case that required a proper investigation in view of the sketchy and unreliable source of the information, as well as the shocking impact of the publication on the dignity and esteem of the Respondent, who is not just the Senate President, but also, the Acting Chief of Kontshingila. The Appellants’ themselves acknowledged the shocking impact of the publication in several portions of the impugned publication where they stated as follows:- “Mr Mahlangu’s shocker ---“the revelation by Mahlangu will definetly come as shocking news to Kontshingila residents, where Gelane is Acting Chief. The area is dominated by the Simelane clan that has been ruled by Gelane for a long time as chief albeit on acting basis”; “Mbabane – Gelane is my daughter. The quote sounds innocent but when you take a closer look at it you will realize that it has the potential of changing the fortunes (for the worst) of one of the country (sic) iron ladies, Senate President Gelane Zwane” and “If Ambrose Mahlangu’s shocking revelation is anything to go by, then Senate President Gelane Zwane is not the rightful person to act or be appointed as Chief of Kontshingila.” [44] Then there is the article of 16 May 2009, which I tag the Appellants’ “false bravado” where they informed the whole nation that the impact or result of their article of 9 May 2009 was that the residents of Kontshingila had taken steps to enforce changes resulting in the removal of Gelane as the Acting Chief of the area. Having by their own showing demonstrated the 29