that she was misleading the authorities of the nation as well as that
she knowingly failed to acknowledge a surviving parent and lastly
over the contention that she was not a Simalane but a Mahlangu.
The evidence led did not establish this at all. The closest to
establishing was a suspicion by Mr. Mahlangu that the Plaintiff
could be his child. The basis for this suspicion are not sound. In
any event the publication was not about a suspicion as it was
unequivocal in its terms that the Plaintiff is Mr. Mahlangu’s
daughter, who was an imposter as acting chief and was ignoring
her own father just because unlike the Simelane’s he had nothing
to offer her.
[50]

The position is settled that truth as a defence would avail the
Defendants where it is shown that the publication was in the
public interest. According to Burchell J. M’s The Law of
Defamation in South Africa, 1985 Publication, Juta and Company
at page 207:‘The South African Case Law does not adopt De Viller’s
interpretation, but rather takes the view that the general rule
is that truth alone is no defence – the publication must also
be for the public benefit. Truth alone may, however, be
pleaded in mitigation of damages.’

[51]

It is argued that the matter was, owing to the fact that the Plaintiff
was a public figure in so far as she was both an acting chief and
Senate President in Parliament, one of public interest which
necessitated the publication of the allegations concerned against
her.

[52]

Having come to the conclusion that the said allegations were
untrue and were defamatory, it cannot avail one to say their
publication was in order simply because the Plaintiff was a public
figure. At page 1212 of the South African case of National Media
Ltd and Others vs Bogoshi 1998 (4) SA 1196 (SCA) (the Bogoshi
Judgment) the position was put in the following words:‘In considering the reasonableness of the publication account
must obviously be taken of the nature, extent and tone of the
allegations. We know for instance, that greater latitude is
usually allowed in respect of Political discussion, and that the
tone in which a Newspaper article is written, or the way in
which it is presented, sometimes provides additional, and
perhaps unnecessary, sting. What will also feature
prominently is the nature of the information on which the

27

Select target paragraph3