SECTOR 4

determine who goes on air and who does not. I don’t think this interference is
going to change much in this current dispensation.”
Not everyone agreed. The more the media grows, the more the media will
generate revenue from multiple sources, reducing the scope for interference. As
it is, “editors don’t just cave in” to pressure. “They defend their actions and
their choices”, although this is less likely to happen at smaller media houses.
“There are very few small media houses that have the editorial clout to stand up
to interference from an owner. That distinction between the big boys and the
smaller media houses is very important.”
The finance minister, for example, owns two radio stations but does not interfere
to the level of deciding who sits on panel discussions. Nonetheless, she has said
on record that her media businesses still need to make money and will not risk
this by going out on a limb. Since the riots, Akaboozi Ku Bbiri, one of the stations
owned by the finance minister, has steered clear of politics.
Similarly, the Agha Khan has business interests other than those he has in media,
and these are “quickly put in front” when it comes to what his media companies
do and do not cover. “You have to strike a compromise: how much money is he
investing in Uganda and how much is a story in the media worth.”
Each politician wants to survive politically, and they establish their own radio
stations as part of this survival strategy, causing a mushrooming in private radio
stations in the process. Those broadcasting in indigenous languages have wide
listenership and generate a lot of political debate. “Some of this debate is not
backed by hard evidence and, at a certain point, cannot be controlled.” It is
necessary for these stations to be accountable to “rigorous editorial policies”.

Scores:
Individual scores:
1

Country does not meet indicator

2

Country meets only a few aspects of indicator

3

Country meets some aspects of indicator

4

Country meets most aspects of indicator

5

Country meets all aspects of the indicator

Average score:

1.8 (2010: 1.4; 2007: 1.4)

AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER UGANDA 2012

67

Select target paragraph3