MOZAMBIQUE

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
y

SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS

To determine which organisations (both government
and public) provide information to citizens upon
request, timeously and with relative ease.

y

To determine which organisations (both government
and public) utilise online platforms to promote ATI.

y

To help measure the progress or setbacks of the
selected institutions compared to previous studies.

Category 1: Website analysis
y

All institutions assessed have websites and
other social media platforms (mainly Facebook
and LinkedIn).

y

Websites contain relevant information, contact
details, instruments, policies, and programmes.
However, not all content is up-to-date.

y

All institutions have chat and comment
options. However, this is not widely utilised,
and in cases where citizens raise questions,
there is no culture of responding.

y

There has been significant improvement in
terms of website accessibility. Most websites are
navigable. However, some are frequently offline.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The research used qualitative and quantitative data
collection methods to evaluate the level of public ATI
held by government and public organisations. Each
MISA Chapter conducted research by evaluating the
websites of government and public organisations
along with submitting written requests for information.
This method seeks to establish the transparency and
efficiency of government and public organisations in
providing information to the public.

Category 2: Requests for information
y

Overall, there is a culture of denying
information. Few institutions responded
positively to requests, and others remained
silent.

y

Information management continues to rely
on a sector not adequately equipped for this
purpose. Receiving documents is done by
receptionists or secretaries, and these are
subsequently forwarded to the departments
responsible for the requested information.

y

The communication and image departments
created by some institutions do not have
autonomy in information management.
Their mandate is limited to coordinating the
relationship between the institution and the
media.

y

Similar to the findings of previous studies,
there is still tight control of information.
Generally, it is under the control of a higher
authority, to whom internal requests for
information must be made, often resulting in
a delayed response.

y

The information management filing system
in the tested institutions remains deficient.
However, the lack of responses is not always
solely due to this challenge. Many times,
it stems from the observation made in the
previous point. The extra caution from some
public officials, especially those belonging to
institutions involved in sensitive cases, also
explains the prevalence of the problem.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
Despite relative peace in Cabo Delgado, the impact
of unrest in that province continues to affect the
functioning of provincial public institutions and centrallevel supervisory entities (ministries).
Another aspect that may have influenced this study is
the successive signs of corruption and mismanagement
in some institutions, leading public servants to adopt a
culture that is averse to information requests.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic forced institutions
to invest in providing services through online ICT,
digitisation of public service provision has been
gradually abandoned.

ORGANISATIONS SURVEYED
The following organisations were surveyed:
1.

Ministry of Education and Human Development

2.

Ministry of Land, Environment, and Rural
Development

3.

Ministry of Justice, Constitutional and Religious
Affairs

4.

Municipal Council of Matola

5.

Mozambique Tax Authority

6.

National Institute for Disaster Risk Management

7.

Municipal Council of Maputo

8.

National Institute of Cotton and Oilseeds

9.

Ministry of Labour, Employment, and Social
Security

10. Mozambique Airlines

57

Select target paragraph3