SECTOR 1 There seems to be some scope for self expression, though. One journalist mentioned that he had written critical articles under his own name and there had been no consequences. This, he thought, was an indication that there are tiny windows of opportunity for freedom of expression. Critical publications are allowed because of the belief that they cater for specific audiences only and will not influence the majority of people. While this might be interpreted as a deliberate smokescreen, giving the impression that the authorities are tolerant of diverse opinions, the simple truth is that ZANU PF is not really concerned about the reach of critical media because these are more or less confined to the small elites in the country. “The fear is real for me. I dont’t have the kind of protection you get from organisations, I have family to look after.” Zimbabwe is not a clean-cut totalitarian dictatorship, it is more of a “subtle dictatorship”. ZANU PF has developed the habit of segmenting the population. Attacks on different groupings do not take place at the same time. Throughout the years the attacks on different segments of the population by the state have effectively split people into separate groups along the lines of their ethnicity, religion, class, political affiliation or professional association. This approach has effectively silenced people and they have internalised not to say or do certain things “which are not done”. Scores: Individual scores: 1 Country does not meet indicator 2 Country meets only a few aspects of indicator. 3 Country meets some aspects of indicator 4 Country meets most aspects of indicator 5 Country meets all aspects of the indicator Average score: 16 1.2 (2008: 1.3 ; 2006: 1.1) AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER ZIMBABWE 2010