Swaziland
In April, Ramodibedi summoned The
Observer’s Managing Editor, Mbongeni
Mbingo, to his chambers and threatened
him with arrest and detention.
According to Mbingo, the Chief Justice
warned him to stop the “negative reporting” on the Makhubu and Maseko case,
or else Ramodibedi would put him behind bars like Makhubu. Furthermore,
the Swaziland Judicial Service Commission (JSC), of which Ramodibedi is the
chair, issued a statement to staff of The
Observer, threatening to imprison them
if they continued their wide coverage of
the Makhubu and Maseko contempt of
court case. The JSC ordered The Observer’s staff to stop reporting on the case
and to stop drawing comparisons between the Swazi and US legal systems.
A further disappointment in 2014 was
the failure of United Nations (UN) agencies to condemn Swaziland’s human
rights violations. The UN Educational
Scientific and Cultural Organisation
(UNESCO) Commission to Swaziland
office did not even attend Swaziland’s
2014 World Press Freedom Day, which
was commemorated by MISA Swaziland, the Swaziland Editors’ Forum,
Swaziland National Association of
Journalists, Swaziland Press Club, Swaziland Community Radio Network and
Media Workers Union of Swaziland.

JOURNALIST SAFETY
Fear of imprisonment and
physical assault looms over
Swazi journalists
The environment for media workers in
Swaziland in 2014 was one of fear, not
only for their freedom – with the threat
of imprisonment looming for those who
speak out against the government and
King – but fear for their physical safety,
with examples of journalists being as-

64

So This is Democracy? 2014

saulted and harassed in the line of their
work.
For example, in 2014, Mbabane Swallows Football Club director Victor
Gamedze assaulted reporter for The
Observer, Baphelele Kunene, in front of
the paper’s managing editor. Kunene reported the assault to the police, but they
took no action against Gamedze. Even
the weekly tabloid, Swazi Mirror, which
broke the story, was affected - its copies
did not reach the newsstands that week.

CENSORSHIP AND BANNING
Restrictive environment breeds
self-censorship
Swaziland’s restrictive media environment leads to self-censorship amongst
both private and state media. There is an
unspoken mandate not to criticise the
royal family and media workers feel, “if
a politician makes reckless statements,
the politician will always make it the
journalist’s problem.”4
In May 2014, for example, The Times
factually reported that the Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, Khabonina Mabuza, told the Public Accounts
Committee E208 million was missing
from state coffers. Mabuza said only
E5m of the Finance Ministry’s recorded
E213m over-expenditure was accounted
for. Mabuza told the committee she did
not want to elaborate because the issue
touched on labadzala (the Swazi authorities).
The government ordered The Times to
retract the story, claiming the report
was incorrect, despite the fact that the
Principal Secretary’s statements were
on record. Radio Swaziland reporter,
Thandiswa Ginindza, was banned from
4
Swaziland African Media Barometer
Report, MISA and Fesmedia Africa 2014

Select target paragraph3