free of political interference. There are several languages in which the media do
not publish or broadcast. There is no real gender balance in the media – men
tend to be favoured for covering important topics.
Access to the internet is widespread in urban areas and, according to panellists,
there is almost total territorial coverage of mobile telecommunications. There
are no laws which restrict access to international media, internet content is not
filtered or blocked by the state and there are no known instances where the
ability to report online has been hampered. Websites and blogs are not required
to register with state authorities.
The Namibian Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) is the public broadcaster of
Namibia. The board is appointed by the Minister of ICT and most members
have close links with the ruling party. There are no provisions in the NBC’s Act
that guarantee its editorial independence. Panellists were divided on whether
NBC has diverse quality programming formats that cater to public interest. NBC
collects TV licence fees, has a subsidy from the government and receives income
from advertising. Nevertheless, it does not seem to have enough money to run its
operations properly, leading some to believe that the funds are poorly managed.
A number of laws seek to promote competition in the Namibian economy in
general. The Communications Act of 2009 empowers the national regulator –
the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN) – to prevent any
anti-competition practices. However, despite this legislation, media concentration
does exist. All six members of the CRAN regulatory body are appointed by the
Minister of ICT, and many of them have close links with the ruling political party.
Nevertheless, CRAN is seen as being balanced, fair and professional. Its decisions
do not seem to be influenced by political authorities and the licensing is diverse.
In the fiscal year 2017/2018, the advertising market amounted to 7.1 million
USD. Government is the biggest advertiser in the country and has used this
power to punish the media that are too negative towards its policies. In 2001,
The Namibian newspaper suffered a ban on government advertising because its
editorial line was deemed too critical. The ban was lifted in 2011.
In Namibia, newspapers regularly publish corrections of articles. Some see this as
a sign that there is not enough accuracy in reporting. Panellists complained that
journalists do not take the time to check their facts and get a more balanced story.
Most complaints received by the office of the media ombudsman centre around
inaccurate reporting, truthfulness and the right of reply. The Editors’ Forum of
Namibia (EFN) developed a Code of Conduct in 2007. It is a self-regulatory code,
enforced by the media ombudsman who is appointed and paid by the EFN.
Corruption is not a common practice in the country and although self-censorship
does exist, it is possibly due to the limitations of journalists’ knowledge, the fear
of losing a job or advertising revenue and security reasons. There are ample
opportunities for training, with several institutions offering formal qualifications
and some media houses offer on-the-job training.
The panel discussion took place at Tungeni Von Bach Dam Resort, Okahandja,
from 30 November – 2 December 2018.

6

AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER NAMIBIA 2018

Select target paragraph3