Analysis of the Broadcasting Services Amendment Bill zimbabwe.misa.org This section which makes provision of support for sustaining community radios is a progressive step, given the limited scope of revenue they are currently allowed. Amendment of Sixth schedule The clause — a television broadcasting licensee providing a sport channel shall ensure that at least 50% of its programming content consists of local television content and material from Africa — raises several considerations that balance cultural preservation, regional representation, and practical challenges. While it aides the promotion of local and regional identity and the development of local sports industries. There is also the drawback of limited availability of high-quality content, making it challenging to meet the 50% quota. Thereby running the risk of reducing viewership. Conclusion The Broadcasting Services Amendment Bill presents a mixed bag of progressive and regressive provisions. While it makes strides in areas such as promoting diversity in broadcasting, supporting community radio, and recognising the rights of persons with disabilities. However, it also introduces certain provisions that could undermine the independence and autonomy of the broadcasting sector. Positive provisions, such as supporting community radio stations, including a language quota incorporating people with disabilities (PWDs) in programming, and recognising gender balance, reflect a progressive approach to addressing diversity, inclusion and equity within the sector. Amendments such as utilising the Broadcasting Fund to sustain community radios and introducing annual calls for licensing applications highlight the Bill’s intent to create opportunities for innovation and expansion in the broadcasting landscape. However, the Bill also reveals areas of concern that must be addressed to achieve its objectives effectively. Provisions that could lead to political interference, particularly in board appointments, editorial control over private broadcasters, and opaque licensing processes, undermine the autonomy and credibility of the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ). Additionally, the practical challenges of implementing quotas for local sports content and ensuring the regulator does not unduly stall diversification need careful consideration. To ensure a thriving and democratic broadcasting sector, the Bill must be refined by 8