As mentioned earlier in this report, at the epicentre of the country’s socio-economic ills is the bane of Zimbabwe’s disputed elections dating to as far back as the 2000 elections as retention of power by whatever means became the major pre-occupation by then president Mugabe and his Zanu PF party. And as if Zimbabwe’s is jinxed, the 2018 elections produced yet another disputed presidential election outcome at a time when the country was beginning to show all the signs of the 2007 – 2008 hyperinflationary period. The country started experiencing acute fuel , foreign currency and drug shortages, erosion of incomes, shortages and increases in the prices of basic commodities in an economy with 90 percent unemployment. Junior doctors went on strike demanding better salaries and improved working conditions. Teachers affiliated to the Amalgamated Rural Teachers Union, embarked on a 270-kilometres protest march from the eastern border town of Mutare to Harare. And as the country battled with a foreign and domestic debt of $16,9 billion, the issue of the outstanding reforms, respect for human rights and freedoms, tackling corruption and government profligacy critical to unlocking international financial support and investments to kick-start the ailing economy, thus remained on the agenda. Meanwhile, the period preceding the July 30 elections was generally peaceful with opposition political parties campaigning freely in rural areas which were largely no-go areas during the Mugabe era. Another plus was President Mnangagwa’s open invitation to previously banned Western countries to observe the elections. All that went up in smoke following the 1 August killings of six civilians in Harare by the military following violent demonstrations by protesters demanding the release of the presidential election results. This resulted in the setting up of a Commission of Inquiry into the shootings led by former South African President Kgalema Motlanthe. And as if that was not enough of a blow to President Mnangagwa’s pledge to break with the past, the elections were dismissed as not being free, fair and credible by the European Union Observer Mission (EUOM), Commonwealth Observer Mission and International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute, among others. The EUOM was scathing in its final report describing the presidential election results as not “verifiable” and “traceable”. It also said the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) “lacked full independence and appeared to not always act in an impartial manner”. 5