SWAZILAND

Research Conclusions
This study has shown government ministries and departments
are not open and do not freely give out information to the Swazi
public. Out of eight institutions asked for information, only half
cared to respond. There is either a lack of knowledge or too much
control of information in government institutions as only two of
them returned the questionnaires within the first week of the 21
days limit, and the two others did so the following week.
The Deputy Prime Minister’s Office (DPM) immediately responded
to the written letter, however, they were later asked to return the
questionnaire sent to them in a clearer form. Also, the Ministry
of Sports, Culture and Youth Affairs replied after five days. The
Ministry of Justice and SRA responded in the second week.
On websites, all the institutions, except for SRA, did not provide
adequate information about the Institutions. The government’s
website, which all seven ministries and departments share, is
relatively standard. While the standard is maintained by the
government’s website, it still lacks relevant information to describe
the functions and what a particular institution is all about. While
the EBC’s website had descriptive information about the institution,
it was the least updated one, while the SRA’s site proved to be the
most regularly fed.

THE Most Secretive Public
Institution in SWAZILAND
Half of the institutions did not reply to a written request for
information: the Ministry of Education; Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC); and the Human
Rights Commission, they thus qualify for the category of most
secretive institution. Despite responding to the written request
for information, the Ministry of Sports, Culture and Youth Affairs
fell behind the Elections and Boundaries Commission, which did
not respond at all. The respective ministry scored little on the oral
interview, which it denied to give. However, EBC’s website was
the most poorly organized. In the oral section, the Ministry of
Education scored the lowest, with a total score of zero. With 2 out
of 20, Foreign Affairs scored last in the written request category.
Both the latter and the Ministry of Education rank lowest overall
for the survey.
The Ministry of Education receives the 2013 Golden Padlock award
for being the most secretive government department, as identified
in this study.

The Most Open Public
Institution in SWAZILAND
Four of the eight institutions replied to the written request for
information, and can hence qualify for the section of open
institutions.
Although the DPM’s office’s website is poorly furnished, the
government department proved to be responsive to written and

78

oral responses. The official who responded did so on the first day
within an hour following the request.
The Ministry of Justice also responded to a written request, but
did not agree to the oral interview. The Ministry received 10 out of
20 points, which is half the requirement. Favourable marks were
obtained for the good attitude and clarity of the responses given.
The newly formed parastatal SRA proved to be organizationally
exceptional, as well as transparent. The parastatal has a toll free
number on its website as well as application forms for different
taxes to be paid by the public. It is proactive in the sense that most
of the services provided as well as answers to what to do, and how
to go about it, can be accessed through the net.
The SRA receives the 2013 Golden Key award for being the most
open public institution in Swaziland

Recommendations
MISA-Swaziland suggests government staff be friendly and
have public relations personnel to improve handling requests
for information. Such personnel should be equipped to talk
to the public and the media. We also suggest that government
departments update their websites to be more relevant and userfriendly.

Select target paragraph3